{"id":1141,"date":"2023-04-20T10:39:37","date_gmt":"2023-04-20T10:39:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/?p=1141"},"modified":"2023-04-20T10:39:42","modified_gmt":"2023-04-20T10:39:42","slug":"lose-weight-gain-huge-debt-ny-provider-has-sued-more-than-300-patients-who-had-bariatric-surgery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/?p=1141","title":{"rendered":"Lose Weight, Gain Huge Debt: NY Provider Has Sued More Than 300 Patients Who Had Bariatric Surgery"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Seven months after Lahavah Wallace\u2019s weight loss operation, a New York bariatric surgery practice sued her, accusing her of \u201cintentionally\u201d failing to pay nearly $18,000 of her bill.<\/p>\n

Long Island Minimally Invasive Surgery, which does business as the New York Bariatric Group, went on to accuse Wallace of \u201cembezzlement,\u201d alleging she kept insurance payments that should have been turned over to the practice.<\/p>\n

Wallace denies the allegations, which the bariatric practice has leveled against patients in hundreds of debt-collection lawsuits filed over the past four years, court records in New York state show.<\/p>\n

In about 60 cases, the lawsuits demanded $100,000 or more from patients. Some patients were found liable for tens of thousands of dollars in interest charges or wound up shackled with debt that could take a decade or more to shake. Others are facing the likely prospect of six-figure financial penalties, court records show.<\/p>\n

Backed by a major private equity firm, the bariatric practice spends millions each year on advertisements<\/a> featuring patients who have dropped 100 pounds or more after bariatric procedures, sometimes having had a portion of their stomachs removed. The ads have run on TV, online, and on New York City subway posters.<\/p>\n

The online ads, often showcasing the slogan \u201cStop obesity for life,\u201d appealed to Wallace, who lives in Brooklyn and works as a legal assistant for the state of New York. She said she turned over checks from her insurer to the bariatric group and was stunned when the medical practice hauled her into court citing an \u201cout-of-network payment agreement<\/a>\u201d she had signed before her surgery.<\/p>\n

\u201cI really didn\u2019t know what I was signing,\u201d Wallace told KFF Health News. \u201cI didn\u2019t pay enough attention.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dr. Shawn Garber, a bariatric surgeon who founded the practice in 2000 on Long Island and serves as its CEO, said that \u201cprior to rendering services\u201d his office staff advises patients of the costs and their responsibility to pay the bill.<\/p>\n

The bariatric group has cited these out-of-network payment agreements in at least 300 lawsuits filed against patients from January 2019 through 2022 demanding nearly $19 million to cover medical bills, interest charges, and attorney\u2019s fees, a KFF Health News review of New York state court records found.<\/p>\n

Danny De Voe, a partner at Sahn Ward Braff Koblenz law firm in Uniondale, New York, who filed many of those suits, declined to comment, citing attorney-client privilege.<\/p>\n

In most cases, the medical practice had agreed to accept an insurance company\u2019s out-of-network rate as full payment for its services \u2014 with caveats, according to court filings.<\/p>\n

In the agreements they signed, patients promised to pay any coinsurance, meeting any deductible, and pass on to the medical practice any reimbursement checks they received from their health plans within seven days.<\/p>\n

Patients who fail to do so \u201cwill be held responsible for the full amount charged for your surgery, plus the cost of legal fees,\u201d the agreement states.<\/p>\n

That \u201cfull amount\u201d can be thousands of dollars higher than what insurers would likely pay, KFF Health News found \u2014 while legal fees and other costs can layer on thousands more.<\/p>\n

Elisabeth Benjamin, a lawyer with the Community Service Society of New York, said conflicts can arise when insurers send checks to pay for out-of-network medical services to patients rather than reimbursing a medical provider directly.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe would prefer to see regulators step in and stop that practice,\u201d she said, adding it \u201ccauses tension between providers and patients.\u201d<\/p>\n

That\u2019s certainly true for Wallace. The surgery practice sued her last August demanding $17,981 in fees it said remained unpaid after her January 2022 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, an operation in which much of the stomach is removed to assist weight loss.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit also tacked on a demand for $5,993 in attorney\u2019s fees, court records show.<\/p>\n

The suit alleges Wallace signed the contract even though she \u201chad no intention\u201d of paying her bills. The complaint goes on to accuse her of \u201ccommitting embezzlement\u201d by \u201cwillfully, intentionally, deliberately and maliciously\u201d depositing checks from her health plan into her personal account.<\/p>\n

The suit doesn\u2019t include details to substantiate these claims, and Wallace said in her court response they are not true. Wallace said she turned over checks for the charges.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey billed the insurance for everything they possibly could,\u201d Wallace said.<\/p>\n

In September, Wallace filed for bankruptcy, hoping to discharge the bariatric care debt along with about $4,700 in unrelated credit card charges.<\/p>\n

The medical practice fired back in November by filing an \u201cadversary complaint\u201d in her Brooklyn bankruptcy court proceeding that argues her medical debt should not be forgiven because Wallace committed fraud.<\/p>\n

The adversary complaint, which is pending in the bankruptcy case, accuses Wallace of \u201cfraudulently\u201d inducing the surgery center to perform \u201celective medical procedures\u201d without requiring payment upfront.<\/p>\n

Both the harsh wording and claims of wrongdoing have infuriated Wallace and her attorney, Jacob Silver, of Brooklyn.<\/p>\n

Silver wants the medical practice to turn over records of the payments received from Wallace. \u201cThere is no fraud here,\u201d he said. \u201cThis is frivolous. We are taking a no-settlement position.\u201d<\/p>\n

A bariatric surgery practice sued Lahavah Wallace last August demanding $17,981 in fees it said remained unpaid after her January 2022 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.(Jackie Molloy for KFF Health News)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Gaining Debt<\/strong><\/p>\n

Few patients sued by the bariatric practice mount a defense in court and those who do fight often lose, court records show.<\/p>\n

The medical practice won default judgments totaling nearly $6 million in about 90 of the 300 cases in the sample reviewed by KFF Health News. Default judgments are entered when the defendant fails to respond.<\/p>\n

Many cases either are pending, or it is not clear from court filings how they were resolved.<\/p>\n

Some patients tried to argue that the fees were too high or that they didn\u2019t understand going in how much they could owe. One woman, trying to push back against a demand for more than $100,000, said in a legal filing that she \u201cwas given numerous papers to sign without anyone of the staff members explaining to me what it actually meant.\u201d Another patient, who was sued for more than $40,000, wrote: \u201cI don\u2019t have the means to pay this bill.\u201d<\/p>\n

Among the cases described in court records:<\/p>\n