State abortion bans in Tennessee and beyond, which constrain women\u2019s health care, have put family planning clinics at risk of losing their federal funding.<\/p>\n

The conflict involves the Title X family planning program, which provides services to low-income people, including minors. As of 2021, more than 3,200 clinics used federal grants to supply free or low-cost contraception, testing for sexually transmitted infections, screening for breast and cervical cancer, and pregnancy-related counseling.<\/p>\n

Federal regulations for the program, which was established more than 50 years ago to reduce unintended pregnancies, say participating clinics must offer pregnant women information about terminating pregnancies and abortion referrals on request. But following those rules puts medical providers at odds with state laws banning abortion, some of which threaten jail time, fines, or the loss of medical licenses if they help someone end a pregnancy.<\/p>\n

President Joe Biden\u2019s administration at the end of March cut off Tennessee\u2019s Title X funds after determining the state health department \u2014 which oversees its clinics and was awarded $7.1 million<\/a> last year \u2014 violated federal rules by not counseling patients about abortion. \u201cContinued funding is not in the best interest of the government,\u201d two U.S. Department of Health and Human Services officials wrote to Tennessee officials<\/a> on March 20. The state had more than 100 Title X clinics as of March, according to an HHS directory.<\/p>\n

In 2022, the federal government awarded Title X grants to roughly 90 entities<\/a>, a mix of state and local governments and private organizations. Those grantees distribute funds to public or private clinics.<\/p>\n

Federal law prohibits clinics from using Title X money to pay for abortions. However, HHS requires clinics to offer pregnant women information about prenatal care and delivery, infant care, foster care, adoption, and pregnancy termination.<\/p>\n

In states where abortion is generally illegal, that could mean directing patients to providers in other states. But Tennessee told family planning clinics they could discuss only services that were legal in the state \u2014 effectively cutting off any talk about abortion.<\/p>\n

Tennessee allows abortions only under limited circumstances, including to save a pregnant person\u2019s life. State health department policies for family planning \u201care consistent with state law,\u201d said Jade Byers, a spokesperson for Republican Gov. Bill Lee. Tennessee allocated state funds to replace the federal money.<\/p>\n

Whitney Rice<\/a>, director of Emory University\u2019s Center for Reproductive Health Research in the Southeast, said failing to provide timely information and referrals for abortion \u201ccould contribute to further delays in people\u2019s ability to access that care,\u201d especially because women may need to travel long distances for it.<\/p>\n

The clash over the federally funded clinics is part of the widening fallout from the Supreme Court\u2019s June 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/em> ending the constitutional right to an abortion.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\tEmail Sign-Up\t\t<\/a>
\n\t<\/h4>\n
\n\t\tSubscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.\t<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
In Idaho<\/a>, which has a near-total abortion ban, two Planned Parenthood clinics with Title X funding recently stopped giving patients abortion information and halted out-of-state referrals, according to a lawsuit<\/a> Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union filed in April against Idaho\u2019s attorney general.<\/p>\n
State law prohibits providers from assisting in performing or attempting to perform an abortion, and violators risk having their medical license suspended.<\/p>\n
The clinics\u2019 decision came after Idaho Attorney General Ra\u00fal Labrador, in a March 27 letter<\/a>, said Idaho law prohibits providers from \u201creferring a woman across state lines to access abortion services.\u201d<\/p>\n
That interpretation is \u201cpreventing medical professionals from providing full information to their patients,\u201d said Mack Smith, spokesperson for Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky.<\/p>\n
Though Labrador later withdrew the letter, Planned Parenthood clinics there still are not referring patients out of state for abortions, Smith said.<\/p>\n
Before Labrador\u2019s letter, the lawsuit states, Planned Parenthood staff would furnish general information about pregnancy options, a list of abortion providers in other states and organizations that help defray patients\u2019 abortion and related costs, and a flyer about Idaho\u2019s abortion law. Staff would also occasionally help patients schedule care outside of Idaho. Now, \u201cPlanned Parenthood providers no longer do so.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen my patients require abortions, I am now forced to tell them that I am unable to help them and that I cannot say anything about their abortion options in other states,\u201d Caitlin Gustafson, a physician who had practiced at an Idaho Planned Parenthood clinic, said in a legal declaration<\/a>.<\/p>\n
Kimberley Harris, a visiting assistant professor at Texas Tech University School of Law, said clinicians in states with strict bans worry about referring patients to other states because a prosecutor could interpret that as \u201caiding and abetting an abortion.\u201d<\/p>\n
Facilitating medication abortion in particular could \u201cpose potential risk to health care providers,\u201d Harris said, because a patient they refer to obtain pills out of state might then take them in a state where abortion is illegal. Medication abortion accounts for most abortions in the U.S. and involves taking a series of pills during the first 10 weeks of pregnancy.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe federal regulation might require me to provide counseling and provide information,\u201d Harris said of clinicians. \u201cBut if you\u2019re telling providers that they may lose their license, or they might go to jail, or they might face a huge fine? Rightfully, they\u2019re going to be concerned.\u201d<\/p>\n
As senior HHS officials travel the country, they are getting an earful about the issue.<\/p>\n
HHS spokesperson Tara Broido said that, increasingly, \u201cproviders and patients have raised concerns about the impact that the Dobbs decision has had on access\u201d to pregnancy counseling and referrals.<\/p>\n
KFF Health News asked Broido which grantees have not been following the counseling and referral requirements. She declined to say.<\/p>\n
People who use Title X\u2019s services are disproportionately women. A report from HHS\u2019 Office of Population Affairs said roughly two-thirds of 1.7 million patients<\/a> in 2021 had family incomes at or below the poverty line. Thirty-six percent were uninsured, more than two times the national uninsured rate for adults.<\/p>\n
The Office of Population Affairs and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention jointly recommend family planning services<\/a> that clinics are expected to follow. They include pregnancy testing and counseling.<\/p>\n
The Title X program has been whipsawed before.<\/p>\n
In 2019, the Trump administration barred Title X clinics<\/a> from making abortion referrals. And the administration said abortion providers couldn\u2019t share physical space with Title X clinics. The number of participating clinics subsequently dropped sharply \u2014 from 3,825 sites in 2019 to 3,031 the following year. With fewer clinics, the number of people receiving free or low-cost family planning services through the program plummeted from 3.1 million in 2019 to 1.5 million in 2020.<\/p>\n
The Biden administration in 2021 overturned many of the Trump policies. The Biden rules remain in effect, but several states sued to block them. That litigation is ongoing.<\/p>\n
Sarah Parshall Perry, a senior legal fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, anticipates additional challenges to Title X rules because \u201cstates have an interest in defending their own laws and their ability to enforce their own laws.\u201d<\/p>\n
In Texas, which prohibits abortion with few exceptions, the nonprofit Every Body Texas oversees 154 Title X family planning clinics.<\/p>\n
Its providers are still counseling pregnant women about options, but \u201cthat\u2019s not to say it hasn\u2019t been made very, very difficult,\u201d said Stephanie LeBleu, the group\u2019s acting Title X director.<\/p>\n
LeBleu said the approach to counseling \u201ccan look different\u201d from clinic to clinic. For example, clinics in rural Texas \u201chave to be a lot more cautious about how they share information with their clients,\u201d LeBleu said. Sometimes that means making a \u201creferral to the referral\u201d \u2014 such as directing patients to organizations like All-Options, which operates a national pregnancy options hotline.<\/p>\n
ask for information on pregnancy options, \u201cour clinics refer clients to other resources,\u201d Karen M. Landers, chief medical officer for the Alabama Department of Public Health, said in a statement. The department declined to say what those resources are and whether clinicians worry about being prosecuted under Alabama law for providing abortion counseling or referrals.<\/p>\n
\u201cClients are additionally informed of the legality of pregnancy termination in the state,\u201d Landers wrote.<\/p>\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRachana Pradhan: <\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t rpradhan@kff.org<\/a>,\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t@rachanadixit<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n
\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\tRelated Topics\t\t\t<\/h3>\n
\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\tContact Us\t\t<\/a>
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\tSubmit a Story Tip\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/section><\/div>\n