{"id":2268,"date":"2024-01-16T10:19:40","date_gmt":"2024-01-16T10:19:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/?p=2268"},"modified":"2024-01-16T10:19:43","modified_gmt":"2024-01-16T10:19:43","slug":"federal-program-to-save-rural-hospitals-feels-growing-pains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/?p=2268","title":{"rendered":"Federal Program to Save Rural Hospitals Feels \u2018Growing Pains\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

KEOKUK, Iowa \u2014 Folks in this Mississippi River town hope a new federal program can revive the optimism engraved long ago in a plaque on the side of their hospital.<\/p>\n

\u201cDedicated to the Future of Health Care in the Tri-State Area,\u201d the sign declares. \u201cMay 11, 1981.\u201d<\/p>\n

More recent placards posted at the facility\u2019s entryways are ominous, however. \u201cClosed,\u201d they say. \u201cNo Trespassing.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Keokuk hospital, which served rural areas of Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri, closed in October 2022. But new owners plan to reopen the hospital with the help of a new federal payment system. The Rural Emergency Hospital program guarantees hospitals extra cash if they provide emergency and outpatient services but end inpatient care.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve been without a hospital for over a year \u2014 and I don\u2019t think anybody in Keokuk or the surrounding areas will be picky in any way, shape, or form,\u201d said Kathie Mahoney, mayor of the town of about 9,800 people. She said residents would prefer to have a full-service hospital with inpatient beds, even though those types of beds had been used sparingly in recent years.<\/p>\n

An engraved sign installed on the Keokuk hospital\u2019s newest addition expressed the hopes organizers had for the facility, which is now closed.(Tony Leys\/KFF Health News)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The revival of the Keokuk hospital would mark a small victory in the nationwide struggle to save rural hospitals, which continue to close due to staffing shortages, low reimbursement rates, and declining patient numbers. The new federal program, which went into effect in January 2023, is meant to stem the closures. But there have been growing pains, said George Pink, deputy director of the North Carolina Rural Health Research Program, which tracks hospital closures and conversions.<\/p>\n

Just 18 of the more than 1,700 eligible rural hospitals nationwide have applied for and won the new designation. Many hospitals are reluctant to give up inpatient services entirely, and some are concerned about how other payment streams could be affected, rural health leaders say. The new designation\u2019s unclear definition of \u201crural\u201d has also caused confusion.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are still in an era of rural hospital closures,\u201d Pink said. Nine hospitals closed in 2023, and that number could rise in 2024, he said. An influx of federal relief funds during the pandemic kept struggling hospitals afloat, but now that money is largely gone.<\/p>\n

The Rural Emergency Hospital program is the first new federal payment model for hospitals since 1997. Dora Hughes, acting chief medical officer of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the new model\u2019s criteria are outlined by statute and \u201chospitals should consider specific circumstances before making the decision to apply.\u201d<\/p>\n

The federal agency is providing outreach to rural communities and welcomes feedback, Hughes wrote in an email to KFF Health News.<\/p>\n

\n

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\tEmail Sign-Up\t\t<\/a>
\n\t<\/h4>\n

\n\t\tSubscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.\t<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Now, rural health leaders and federal lawmakers are working quickly to tweak the new program to attract more applicants, said Carrie Cochran-McClain, chief policy officer of the National Rural Health Association.<\/p>\n

Currently, facilities that convert to rural emergency hospitals receive a 5% increase in Medicare payments, plus an average annual payment of about $3.2 million, in exchange for giving up their expensive inpatient beds and focusing solely on emergency and outpatient care. Rural hospitals with no more than 50 beds, like Keokuk\u2019s, that closed after the law was signed on Dec. 27, 2020<\/a>, are eligible to apply for the program and reopen with emergency and outpatient services.<\/p>\n

More than 100 rural hospitals nationwide have inquired about converting, said Janice Walters, interim executive director for the Rural Health Redesign Center, which has a federal grant to provide technical assistance to hospitals that want to apply.<\/p>\n

But only about a quarter of those inquiries are likely to become a rural emergency hospital, and persuading more troubled hospitals to make the leap would require regulators to make changes, Walters said.<\/p>\n

Her advice? \u201cGive them 10 beds to just take care of their community.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a journal article published last year, general surgeon Sara Schaefer worried about the unintended consequences of getting rid of rural inpatient beds. Schaefer, who spent six months of medical school at a small rural Idaho hospital, said she saw firsthand how difficult it was for the hospital to transfer patients to bigger facilities, which were often too full to take them.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere has to be a better way,\u201d said Schaefer, who is also a research fellow at the Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy at the University of Michigan.<\/p>\n

\"A
A staffer left a farewell note at a nurses\u2019 station in the surgery department of the hospital in Keokuk, Iowa, which closed in 2022.(Tony Leys\/KFF Health News)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The rural health association\u2019s Cochran-McClain said lawmakers are considering changes that could allow the hospitals to:<\/p>\n