{"id":2915,"date":"2024-06-13T09:35:39","date_gmt":"2024-06-13T09:35:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/?p=2915"},"modified":"2024-06-13T09:35:40","modified_gmt":"2024-06-13T09:35:40","slug":"bidens-on-target-about-what-repealing-aca-would-mean-for-preexisting-condition-protections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/?p=2915","title":{"rendered":"Biden\u2019s on Target About What Repealing ACA Would Mean for Preexisting Condition Protections"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\tJacob Gardenswartz<\/span><\/p>\n

If the Affordable Care Act were terminated, \u201cthat would mean over a hundred million Americans will lose protections for preexisting conditions.\u201d<\/p>\n

President Joe Biden in a campaign advertisement, May 8<\/p>\n

President Joe Biden\u2019s reelection campaign wants voters to contrast his record on health care policy with his predecessor\u2019s. In May, Biden\u2019s campaign began airing a monthlong, $14 million ad campaign targeting swing-state voters and minority groups with spots on TV, digital, and radio.<\/p>\n

In the ad, titled \u201cTerminate<\/a>,\u201d Biden assails former President Donald Trump for his past promises to overturn the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. Biden also warns of the potential effect if Trump is returned to office and again pursues repeal.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat would mean over a hundred million Americans will lose protections for preexisting conditions,\u201d Biden said in the ad.<\/p>\n

Less than six months from Election Day, polls show<\/a> Trump narrowly leading Biden in a head-to-head race in most swing states. And voters trust Trump to better handle issues such as inflation, crime, and the economy by significant margins.<\/p>\n

An ABC News\/Ipsos poll<\/a> of about 2,200 adults, released in early May, shows the only major policy issues on which Biden received higher marks than Trump were health care and abortion access. It\u2019s no surprise, then, that the campaign is making those topics central<\/a> to Biden\u2019s pitch to voters.<\/p>\n

As such, we dug into the facts surrounding Biden\u2019s claim.<\/p>\n

Preexisting Condition Calculations<\/strong><\/p>\n

The idea that 100 million Americans are living with one or more preexisting conditions is not new. It was the subject of a back-and-forth between then-candidate Biden and then-President Trump during their previous race, in 2020. After Biden cited that statistic in a presidential debate<\/a>, Trump responded, \u201cThere aren\u2019t a hundred million people with preexisting conditions.\u201d<\/p>\n

A KFF Health News\/PolitiFact HealthCheck<\/a> at the time rated Biden\u2019s claim to be \u201cmostly true,\u201d finding a fairly large range of estimates \u2014 from 54 million to 135 million \u2014 of the number of Americans with preexisting conditions. Estimates on the lower end tend to consider \u201cpreexisting conditions\u201d to be more severe chronic conditions such as cancer or cystic fibrosis. Estimates at the spectrum\u2019s higher end include people with more common health problems such as asthma and obesity, and behavioral health disorders such as substance use disorder or depression.<\/p>\n

Biden\u2019s May ad focuses on how many people would be vulnerable if protections for people with preexisting conditions were lost. This is a matter of some debate. To understand it, we need to break down the protections put in place by the ACA, and those that exist separately.<\/p>\n

Before and After<\/strong><\/p>\n

Before the ACA\u2019s preexisting condition protections took effect in 2014, insurers in the individual market<\/a> \u2014 people buying coverage for themselves or their families \u2014 could charge higher premiums to people with particular conditions, restrict coverage of specific procedures or medications, set annual and lifetime coverage limits on benefits, or deny people coverage.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere were a number of practices used by insurance companies to essentially protect themselves from the costs associated with people who have preexisting conditions,\u201d said Sabrina Corlette<\/a>, a co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University and an expert on the health insurance marketplace.<\/p>\n

Insurers providing coverage to large employers could impose long waiting periods before employees\u2019 benefits kicked in. And though employer-sponsored plans couldn\u2019t discriminate against individual employees based on their health conditions, small-group plans for businesses with fewer than 50 employees could raise costs across the board if large numbers of employees in a given company had such conditions. That could prompt some employers to stop offering coverage.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe insurer would say, \u2018Well, because you have three people with cancer, we are going to raise your premium dramatically,\u2019 and therefore make it hard for the small employer to continue to offer coverage to its workers because the coverage is simply unaffordable,\u201d recalled Edwin Park<\/a>, a research professor at Georgetown University\u2019s McCourt School of Public Policy who researches public health insurance markets.<\/p>\n

As a result, many people with preexisting conditions experienced what some researchers dubbed \u201cjob lock<\/a>.\u201d People felt trapped in their jobs because they feared they wouldn\u2019t be able to get health insurance anywhere else.<\/p>\n

Some basic preexisting condition protections exist independent of the ACA. The 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act<\/a>, for example, restricted how insurers could limit coverage and mandated that employer-sponsored group plans can\u2019t refuse to cover someone because of a health condition. Medicare and Medicaid similarly can\u2019t deny coverage based on health background, though age and income-based eligibility requirements mean many Americans don\u2019t qualify for that coverage.<\/p>\n

Once the ACA\u2019s preexisting condition protections kicked in, plans sold on the individual market had to provide a comprehensive package of benefits to all purchasers, no matter their health status.<\/p>\n

Still, some conservatives say Biden\u2019s claim overstates how many people are affected by Obamacare protections.<\/p>\n

Even if you consider the broadest definition of the number of Americans living with such conditions, \u201cthere is zero way you could justify that 100 million people would lose coverage\u201d without ACA protections, said Theo Merkel<\/a>, who was a Trump administration health policy adviser and is now a senior research fellow with the Paragon Health Institute and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a conservative think tank.<\/p>\n

Joseph Antos, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, called the ad\u2019s preexisting conditions claim \u201cthe usual bluster.\u201d To reach 100 million people affected, he said, \u201cyou have to assume that a large number of people would lose coverage.\u201d And that\u2019s unlikely to happen, he said.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s because most people \u2014 about 55% of Americans, according to the most recent government data<\/a> \u2014 receive health insurance through their employers. As such, they\u2019re protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act rules, and their plans likely wouldn\u2019t change, at least in the short term, if the ACA went away.<\/p>\n

Antos said major insurance companies, which have operated under the ACA for more than a decade, would likely maintain the status quo even without such protections. \u201cThe negative publicity would be amazing,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

People who lose their jobs, he said, would be vulnerable.<\/p>\n

But Corlette argued that losing ACA protections could lead to Americans being priced out of their plans, as health insurers again begin medical underwriting in the individual market.<\/p>\n

Park predicted that many businesses could also gradually find themselves priced out of their policies.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor those firms with older, less healthy workers than other small employers, they would see their premiums rise,\u201d he told KFF Health News.<\/p>\n

Moreover, Park said, anytime people lost work or switched jobs, they\u2019d risk losing their insurance, reverting to the old days of job lock.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn any given year, the number [of people affected] will be much smaller than the 100 million, but all of those 100 million would be at risk of being discriminated against because of their preexisting condition,\u201d Park said.<\/p>\n

Our Ruling<\/strong><\/p>\n

We previously ruled Biden\u2019s claim that 100 million Americans have preexisting conditions as in the ballpark<\/a>, and nothing suggests that\u2019s changed. Depending on the definition, the number could be smaller, but it also could be even greater and is likely to have increased since 2014.<\/p>\n

Though Biden\u2019s claim about the number of people who would be affected if those protections went away seems accurate, it is unclear how a return to the pre-ACA situation would manifest.<\/p>\n

On the campaign trail this year, Trump has promised \u2014 as he did many times in the past \u2014 to replace the health law<\/a> with something better. But he\u2019s never produced a replacement plan. Biden\u2019s claim shouldn\u2019t be judged based on his lack of specificity.<\/p>\n

We rate Biden\u2019s claim Mostly True.<\/p>\n

our sources<\/h4>\n

ABC News\/Ipsos Poll, \u201cSix Months Out, a Tight Presidential Race With a Battle Between Issues & Attributes<\/a>,\u201d May 5, 2024<\/p>\n

Avalere, \u201cRepeal of ACA\u2019s Pre-Existing Condition Protections Could Affect Health Security of Over 100 Million People<\/a>,\u201d Oct. 23, 2018<\/p>\n

Biden-Harris 2024 campaign email, \u201cNEW AD: Biden-Harris 2024 Launches \u2018Terminate\u2019 Slamming Trump for Attacks on Health Care,\u201d May 8, 2024<\/p>\n

Center for American Progress, \u201cNumber of Americans With Preexisting Conditions by District for the 116th Congress<\/a>,\u201d Oct. 2, 2019<\/p>\n

Census Bureau, \u201cHealth Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2022<\/a>,\u201d September 2023<\/p>\n

CNN, \u201cTrump Administration Gives States New Power to Weaken Obamacare<\/a>,\u201d Oct. 22, 2018<\/p>\n

Department of Health and Human Services, \u201cHealth Insurance Coverage for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions: The Impact of the Affordable Care Act<\/a>,\u201d Jan. 5, 2017<\/p>\n

Department of Health and Human Services, \u201cThe Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 Helpful Tips<\/a>,\u201d accessed May 15, 2024<\/p>\n

Email exchanges with Biden-Harris 2024 campaign official, May 13-15, 2024<\/p>\n

Email exchange with Karoline Leavitt, Trump 2024 campaign national press secretary, May 13, 2024<\/p>\n

KFF, \u201cKFF Health Tracking Poll: The Public\u2019s Views on the ACA<\/a>,\u201d May 15, 2024<\/p>\n

KFF, \u201cRecent Trends in Mental Health and Substance Use Concerns Among Adolescents<\/a>,\u201d Feb. 6, 2024<\/p>\n

KFF Health News, \u201cDrowning in a \u2018High-Risk Insurance Pool\u2019 \u2014 At $18,000 a Year<\/a>,\u201d Feb. 27, 2017<\/p>\n

KFF Health News and PolitiFact, \u201cBiden\u2019s in the Ballpark on How Many People Have Preexisting Conditions<\/a>,\u201d Oct. 1, 2020<\/p>\n

The New York Times, \u201cTrump Leads in 5 Key States, as Young and Nonwhite Voters Express Discontent With Biden<\/a>,\u201d May 13, 2024<\/p>\n

Phone interview and email exchanges with Theo Merkel<\/a>, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the director of the Private Health Reform Initiative at the Paragon Health Institute, May 14-15, 2024<\/p>\n

Phone interview with Edwin Park<\/a>, a research professor at Georgetown University\u2019s McCourt School of Public Policy, May 22, 2024<\/p>\n

Phone interview with Sabrina Corlette<\/a>, a co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, May 14, 2024<\/p>\n

Truthsocial.com, post by @realDonaldTrump<\/a>, Nov. 25, 2023<\/p>\n

The Wall Street Journal, \u201cHealthcare.gov to Shut Down During Parts of Enrollment Period for Maintenance<\/a>,\u201d Sept. 23, 2017<\/p>\n

Work, Aging and Retirement, \u201cJob Lock, Work, and Psychological Well-Being in the United States<\/a>,\u201d Feb. 19, 2016<\/p>\n

YouTube.com\/@CSPAN, \u201cFirst 2020 Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden<\/a>,\u201d Sept. 29, 2020<\/p>\n

YouTube.com\/@JoeBiden, \u201cTerminate<\/a>\u201d campaign advertisement, May 10, 2024<\/p>\n

Phone interview with Joseph Antos, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, June 5, 2024<\/p>\n

Health Affairs, What It Means To Cover Preexisting Conditions<\/a>, Sept. 11, 2020<\/p>\n

KFF, Pre-Existing Conditions and Medical Underwriting in the Individual Insurance Market Prior to the ACA<\/a>, Dec. 12, 2016<\/p>\n

PolitiFact, \u201cDoes Trump Want To Repeal the ACA, as Biden Says? Tracking His Changing Stance Over the Years<\/a>,\u201d June 3, 2024<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jacob Gardenswartz If the Affordable Care Act were terminated, \u201cthat would mean over a hundred million Americans will lose protections for preexisting conditions.\u201d President Joe Biden in a campaign advertisement, May 8 President Joe Biden\u2019s reelection campaign wants voters to contrast his record on health care policy with his predecessor\u2019s. In May, Biden\u2019s campaign began […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2916,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-the-health-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2915","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2915"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2915\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2917,"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2915\/revisions\/2917"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/healthynewsusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}