a judge ruled<\/a> that Lydia qualified for coverage.<\/p>\nThe notice generated by the Deloitte-operated system was deemed \u201clegally insufficient\u201d because it omitted the date Lydia\u2019s coverage would end. Her case highlights a known eligibility system problem: Beneficiary notices contain \u201cnon-compliant or inconsistent dates\u201d and are \u201cmissing required elements and information,\u201d according to the 2023 audit.<\/p>\n
Deloitte declined to comment on Colorado. Speaking broadly, Smith said, \u201cIncorrect information can come in a lot of forms.\u201d<\/p>\n
Last spring in Pennsylvania, Deloitte\u2019s eligibility role expanded to include the Children\u2019s Health Insurance Program and 126,000 enrollees.<\/p>\n
Pennsylvania\u2019s Department of Human Services said an error occurred when converting to the state\u2019s eligibility system, maintained by Deloitte through a $541 million contract. DHS triaged the errors, but, for \u201ca small window of time,\u201d some children who still had coverage \u201cwere not able to use it.\u201d<\/p>\n
These issues affected 9,269 children last June and 2,422 in October, DHS said. A temporary solution was implemented in December and a permanent fix came through in April.<\/p>\n
Catanese, the union representative, said it was another in a long history of problems. Among the most prevalent, he said: The system freezes for hours. When asked about that, Smith said \u201cit’s hyperbole.\u201d<\/p>\n
Instead of the efficiency that Deloitte touted, Catanese said, \u201cthe system constantly runs into errors that you have to duct tape and patchwork around.\u201d<\/p>\n
KFF Health News senior correspondent Renuka Rayasam and correspondents Daniel Chang, Bram Sable-Smith, and Katheryn Houghton contributed to this report.<\/em><\/p>\n